Just ran across another photo sharing site called Phanfare, sent as a link to some photos from a school function a few weeks ago. After viewing the photos, I had a look at the Phanfare Terms of Service, and sure enough, following Facebook’s example, Phanfare takes rights to any content its users post:
“When you post User Content to the Site, you authorize and direct us to make such copies thereof as we deem necessary in order to facilitate the posting and storage of the User Content on the Site. By posting User Content to any part of the Site, you automatically grant, and you represent and warrant that you have the right to grant, to the Company an irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, fully paid, worldwide license (with the right to sublicense) to use, copy, publicly perform, publicly display, reformat, translate, excerpt (in whole or in part) and distribute such User Content for any purpose on or in connection with the Site or the promotion thereof, to prepare derivative works of, or incorporate into other works, such User Content, and to grant and authorize sublicenses of the foregoing (for promotional and advertising purposes, among others). Any such use by Phanfare will be governed by our privacy policy. You may remove your User Content from the Site at any time. If you choose to remove your User Content, the license granted above will automatically expire, however you acknowledge that the Company may retain archived copies of your User Content.”
I suspect this is a case of lawyers telling the founders this kind of thing is a good idea, but it’s only a good idea if your users don’t take the time to read all this fine print. And who does? Only people who for some reason care about how their photos are used. But everyone should.
Facebook and Phanfare grab these rights in fine print and even if their only intention is to use user pictures to promote their own products, the proper, ethical thing to do IS TO ASK PERMISSION! Most people would be pleased, after all, to be featured in a Facebook ad. But using someone’s photograph of a child or grandmother without their permission and then pointing to the TOS to say “Hey, you gave us an irrevocable, perpetual, non-exclusive, transferable, fully paid, worldwide license (with the right to sublicense) to use, copy, publicly perform, publicly display, reformat, translate, excerpt (in whole or in part) and distribute such User Content for any purpose on or in connection with the Site or the promotion thereof” is reprehensible. And I’m not talking about any loss of usage fee, I mean a lack of basic courtesy. And this addresses only the use of personal photos to promote the service. Words like “for promotional and advertising purposes, among others” allow usage OTHER than self-promotion, which brings me back to the worst-case scenario already mentioned about some entity like Getty, which is buying every collection of photos it can, buying YOUR photos without your consent and doing whatever it wishes with them.
Pingback: Phanfare Blog: Andrew Erlichson » Privacy - The Principle of least surprise()