Milky Way over Mono Lake


_T2P7445-Edit-2

A proper landscape photo trip is something like a marathon, an endurance test to determine how badly you want the chance for another good image. This test is easier to pass at the beginning of the tip, before consecutive nights of 3-4 hours of sleep have caught up with you.

When we arrived at Yosemite on Monday, we spent the afternoon at Olmstead Point with a fantastic view of Cloud’s Rest with Half Dome in the distance. (More on this location later, I hope.) After spending the early evening atop massive pieces of granite, we returned to our lodgings in Lee Vining, an odd little town on the western shore of Mono Lake. It turned out I’d succeeded in infecting one of our group with my interest in astral photography, and together we convinced a third to give up on an early night and head to Mono Lake to see what the eerie landscape there might look like under the Milky Way. (Btw, I hope to be posting links to their images as well when they start to show up on their Flickr accounts.)

Mono Lake is a remarkable place, both for the unusual geology that creates tufa formations from an odd chemical reaction of fresh water seeping up from below the lake and mixing with the lake’s very salty water, as well as for the history the location plays in California’s struggle for water. At midnight, there is very little light pollution from Lee Vining, which is the only town near enough to spill artificial light on this section of the shore, and the altitude makes the Milky Way’s gases visible to the naked eye. What is not visible as you stand there in the near pitch blackness, but which does show up in long exposures with a camera, are the billions of stars and colored gasses of this part of the galaxy. The first few exposures are a bit of a surprise when you find out what the camera tells you is there but that you can’t see. The sky simply looks black, the stars all look white, and you can just make out a vein of gasses in a long irregular line across the sky. A 30 second exposure, however, shows that there is much more going on that that.


  • Jan Lee

    Amazing! I hesitate to use this word since it is so over used, BUT!!! In this case it’s deserved. Beautiful.

  • I’m quite jealous of that clean sensor of the D700 over my D90 at the ISOs needed to do this kind of photography. Not that I don’t have shots I’m happy with, but I certainly had limitations I don’t normally have to worry about.

    Great job here – it really is amazing what pops out on camera that’s hidden to the eye. I’ve done a fair bit of night photography, but typically under the full moon. This was a new experience for me to take in.

  • Thank you both for the compliments.

    @Tyler-The RAW files is not as clean as this–Noise Ninja makes a big difference. But again, it’s nice to see that the d700’s additional cost does have real world benefits and lower noise is certainly one of them.

  • David Bailey

    Awesome. Absolutely awesome. Lee-Ann and I loved it when we saw it, and it might actually convince her go there! You never know…

  • Adam Timmer

    Fantastic! There is so much to enjoy in this photo. I’m glad you stayed up late and we can enjoy the benefits of your hard work.

  • Pingback: From Salt Lake to Mono Lake « Scott Jones Photography()

  • Hi Scott!

    Im so impressed of your night shots showing all the glowing stars up in the sky. They look so amazing!

    A while ago I tried to do this myself. I set the ISO high, long exsposure etc… I had good hopes for the image, but when I looked at it the result was almost pitch black, except 2 (almost not) visible stars in the sky.

    Do you have any tips and trix? 🙂

    • Thank you, Dave, Adam and Stoffs!

      As for tips, I recommend determining your ballpark settings in your first couple of exposures and then refining those settings to get as close to the image you want as you can. In order to avoid wasting valuable time only to get an image that is too dark, use your highest ISO and widest aperture so that you can find something that works with trial exposures of the shortest duration possible. With these two options maxed out, try 10 seconds and see what you get. It the image is too dark, try 20 seconds. If that’s too bright, start bringing the ISO down to compensate. Aim for having the ISO as low as possible while getting enough light to make a good exposure. If you’re shooting with a wide angle lens, you can get away with a fast aperture and not suffer too much from depth of field problems. So open the lens up and leave it at its max aperture while you determine the other two settings, time and ISO. Keep in mind that you’ll also want the shortest exposure possible to make the stars as sharp as possible, unless you’re going for star trails, in which case your longer exposure will allow lower ISO and/or a smaller aperture. Hope that helps!

  • What a neat story here, Instructive item I enjoyed it very much, really cool!!!!! Please keep doing the good things that you are doing now. Erwin Creasman

  • Pingback: From Salt Lake to Mono Lake : Scott Jones: Landscape and MotoGP Photographer()